By Alvin Mlambo
So
you’re a Christian. You take your faith and beliefs very seriously and you read
your bible religiously (no pun intended). You’ve heard the stories of Adam
and Eve,
Moses, Isaac, Jacob, Lot, Joseph, Samson, Noah, and
many other heroes since you were in Sunday school and now as an adult, you read
them for yourself and managed to decipher the deeper meanings behind them. Then
one day you come across a movie retelling one of your favourite bible stories
and you decide to turn that evening into movie night with the family. Twenty
minutes into it, you and your family members start throwing befuddled looks at
each other. Finally, you stand up, retrieve your bible and with intense folds
on your forehead you page through the chapters until you find the chapter and
figure the movie is based on. With a sigh of relief at the restoration of your
confidence in your bible knowledge, you click your tongue and proclaim “No man. This is not how
it happens in the bible! Where do they get this stuff?”
In
2019, global box office revenue hit a record US$45.5
Billion with Hollywood still being the granddaddy
of this global business. Since the birth of cinema, film makers have been
bringing their original ideas to life on the silver screen. When these are in
short supply, books, novels, short stories, magazine and newspaper articles
have also provided rich material for the movies. Unfortunately, to the
irritation of most Christians,
the Bible
has been frequently used as a source of inspiration as well. This process would
not be problematic were it not for Hollywood’s fondness for deviating from the
source material and taking artistic freedoms with the stories. So why the
inaccuracies? Are they deliberate or just the products of ignorant screen
writers?
As Christians,
we are understandably protective and prickly about scriptural integrity with
regards to entertainment. The
Bible, our life manual, is the blueprint of our very
existence and any bastardisation of it would be an affront to all we hold dear.
However it seems the Hollywood establishment does not share our passion. So, I
decided to put my righteous indignation aside for a bit and look deeper into
the business of film making being a big movie lover myself. Boiling the issue
down to its raw essence, Hollywood, just like any other commercial entity, is a
money-making endeavour. When taking the decision to make these movies, they are
not driven by their deep love for the Christian faith. They would’ve
realised an opportunity to pad their bank accounts by saving on a marketing
budget and bringing a familiar story to theatres. When filmmakers look at the
bible, all they see is another piece of source material no different from a Stephen King
novel or a Clive
Barker short story. So, they alter, add, enhance and distort
some details that may be cinematically inconvenient to the story they want to
tell.
The Bible
is terse and minimalist in its story telling. This leaves the door wide open to
the reader’s own interpretation and imagination to fill in the gaps.
When
film makers realise an opportunity to make some money off a story in the bible
with scant details, they fill in the cavities with varying degrees of
imagination. The Young Messiah (2016)
is a film that revolves around a seven-year-old
Jesus Christ and
how he discovers his life’s purpose after his family’s return to Nazareth from
Egypt. The writers of the New Testament say rather little about this period
apart from the reflection that “Jesus grew in wisdom and
stature, and in favour with God and man” – Luke 2 Vs 52.
Hardly enough material to make a 110-minute
feature out of. So, the filmmakers based their movie on Anne Rice’s
book Christ the Lord: Out of Egypt
instead. The same person who wrote The
Vampire Chronicles by the way. Just saying. The
story of Noah only spans Chapters 5 to 9 in the book of Genesis. The majority
of which focus on the construction of the ark and the duration of the rain. So,
with such little information to work with, the makers of the film Noah
(2014) had to add flesh to the story bones by adding
imaginary devices such as giant rock people, mining for Zohar,
the evil stowaway on the ark and Noah’s baby murdering conviction.
As I
stated before, filmmakers are out to make money from their efforts and that
comes from ticket sales. To widen their potential audience, they need to appeal
to both the Christian crowd and the non-believers alike. To capture those who
take a more scientific view of life rather than putting stock in miracles, film
producers will water down, bleach or even totally retell a story. In Exodus:
Gods and Kings (2014) director
Ridley Scott opted
to use a messenger of God in
the form of a child to speak to Moses
as opposed to the Almighty Himself speaking through the burning bush. In the Bible,
God uses Aaron
to transform the Nile, this is totally omitted in the movie. Instead the Nile
turns red after hundreds of crocodiles kill themselves and others in a violent
frenzy. Due to this, frogs migrate from the river onto land in search of
dwindling food. And that is how the movie explains away the plague of the
frogs. After the frogs fail to survive on land, the stench of their rotting
corpses attracts an unusual number of flies and soon locusts follow. So, you
get the idea.
In all
fairness, there are some small deviations from scripture in these bible movies
that are used as a device to progress the story and take little to nothing away
from the major truth. However, when a movie like Noah replaces the main theme
of the story from judgement of sin to “The
Creator” (the name God is never
mentioned in the movie)
punishing man for environmental destruction instead, it’s just heresy. A
departure like that and the “scientific” explanation for the plagues in Exodus
affect the way non-believers and lukewarm Christians
view God’s majesty
and omnipotence. A visual interpretation is so powerful to the extent that most
people take the themes and ideals therein as fact. Rather than read the bible,
most who have questions about the faith will simply watch a movie based on a
bible story and be done. Even those who do read the bible may have their
recollections altered by watching such retellings. The human mind is like a
sponge and is regrettably very inefficient at filtering what to and what not to
retain. Whether these creative liberties are the result of spiritual influences
by agents of the Devil or simply commercial decisions and narrative
conveniences, the effect is the same, diminishing the supremacy and
invincibility of GOD.
I will
put my head on the block here and say that I am extremely doubtful that there
will ever be a movie that will win the universal praise of the Christian audience
even if it is indeed scripturally faithful. Debate still rages on about why Jesus
Christ of Nazareth, a Galilean Jew, is always
portrayed as a blue-eyed Caucasian. Was the forbidden fruit in the Garden
of Eden an apple, apricot, grape, pomegranate or
pear? Was Jonah
swallowed by a shark, whale or some sort of now
extinct marine reptile? Who was Cain’s
wife? And what type of fish was it that Jesus
Christ fed the 5 000 with? With these and many other
matters not explicitly detailed in The
Bible, there is really no way that a film maker can
truly create a visual story to please all evangelical critics and the general Christian movie
lover. On our end we must never forget that Hollywood and its global cousins
are not theological scholars or Evangelists, so we must not hold them to that
standard. So next time you come across a “Bible
Movie” with a star-studded cast of Oscar winners and
a director fresh off a giant alien robot movie, I advise you to give it a hard
pass. Unless, of course, you’re willing to tolerate some measure of imagination
and fiction mixed in with your favourite bible tale. Just stick to reading through the paper pages
of the Good Book itself. It hasn’t disappointed me yet.
